Williams v. Giles
| Carlos R Williams |
| J C Giles and Attorney General for the State of Alabama |
| 2:2010cv01069 |
| April 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Autauga |
| R David Proctor |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION-re: R&R 25 . The court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied as to Claims (1),(2), and (14). Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/28/2013. (AVC)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER-re: R&R 10 The court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge and ACCEPTS his Recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's request for habeas corpus relief based on Claims (3) through (13)is DENIED. With respect to P etitioners Claims (1), (2), and (14), the court will conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the viability of Petitioners argument that trial counsel failed to call Petitioner as a witness in his own defense despite Petitioners stated desire to testify. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge to conduct a hearing in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/8/2012. (AVC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
