Jackson v. Dunn Construction Company, Inc

Plaintiff: Randy Jackson
Defendant: Dunn Construction Company, Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv00016
Filed: January 3, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 21, 2013 34 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 26 , MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dunn Construction Company, Inc, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as further set out in order. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 02/21/13. (CVA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Dunn Construction Company, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Jackson
Represented By: Cynthia Forman Wilkinson
Represented By: Larry R Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dunn Construction Company, Inc
Represented By: Timothy A Palmer
Represented By: James A Patton, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?