Carlson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Stephanie Sue Carlson
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00871
Filed: March 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John E Ott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER DISMISSING CASE this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with the agreement of the parties as noted in Plaintiffs motion. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on 11/28/11. (KGE, )
November 28, 2011 Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice by Stephanie Sue Carlson. (McDonald, Kerry)
November 22, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER. On October 26, 2011, the court held a telephone conference with the parties. During that telephone conference Plaintiff indicated that she would be filing a motion to dismiss this action. However, no such motion has been filed. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by November 29, 2011, why she has not filed a motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on November 22, 2011. (TDS)
October 26, 2011 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate-Judge John E Ott: Telephone Conference held on 10/26/2011. (KWC)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER. This case is set for a telephone conference at 10:00 a.m. on October 26, 2011. The court will initiate the call. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on October 25, 2011. (TDS)
October 5, 2011 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate-Judge John E Ott: Status Conference held by telephone on 10/5/2011; order to be entered by court. (KWC)
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER. In accordance with the discussion of the parties during today's telephone conference, this case is hereby STAYED pending a decision from the Southern District of Indiana court on whether to allow Plaintiff to amend her complaint in that court. The parties are ORDERED to notify this court within three (3) days of such decision. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on October 5, 2011. (TDS)
September 30, 2011 Filing 18 Second MOTION for Extension of Time and Request for Staus Conference by Stephanie Sue Carlson. (McDonald, Kerry)
September 30, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER. This case is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice and Request for Status Conference (Doc. # 18), filed September 30, 2011. For good cause shown the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until October 14, 2011 to file a motion to dismiss without prejudice or otherwise respond to Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 14). Additionally, this case is SET for a telephone status conference on Wednesday, October 5, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. No later than 4:30 p.m. on October 4, 2011, each party shall e-mail chambers (ott_chambers@alnd.uscourts.gov) with the names and phone numbers of those attorneys who will be on the call. The court will initiate the call. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on September 30, 2011. (TDS)
September 30, 2011 Telephone Conference set for 10/5/2011 02:00 PM before Magistrate-Judge John E Ott. (KGE, )
September 15, 2011 Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #15 Brief by Stephanie Sue Carlson. (McDonald, Kerry)
September 15, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER. This case is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 17), filed September 15, 2011. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's motion to dismiss is due by 9/29/2011. Defendant's Reply is due by 10/6/2011. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on September 15, 2011. (TDS)
September 12, 2011 Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Higey, Todd)
September 1, 2011 Filing 15 Brief re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, Stay Case filed by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Higey, Todd)
September 1, 2011 Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, Stay Case by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Higey, Todd)
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER that the parties file their planning meeting report by 9/12/11. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on 9/1/11. (DDR)
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER setting motion deadline on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, Stay Case (Doc. # 14), filed September 1, 2011. Plaintiff's response is due by September 15, 2011. Defendant's reply is due by September 22, 2011. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on September 1, 2011. (TDS)
August 17, 2011 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Higey, Todd)
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #12 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint is due by September 1, 2011. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on August 17, 2011. (AMC)
August 5, 2011 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Stephanie Sue Carlson. Plaintif's Complaint. (McDonald, Kerry) Modified text on 8/5/2011 (KGE, ).
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying Motion to Amend; granting in part and denying in part #2 Motion to Dismiss; The age-discrimination claims arising from the factual allegations in the Complaint #1 , are DISMISSED with prejudice. Pla is DIRECTED to file an Amended Complaint setting out each instance of alleged unlawful conduct in separate counts by 8/5/11. Thereafter, dft may file another motion to dismiss, asserting new arguments in addition to any arguments advanced in its previous motion to dismiss, by 8/19/11. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on 7/22/11. (KGE, )
July 22, 2011 Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by CSX Transportation, Inc., Stephanie Sue Carlson.. (KGE, )
July 22, 2011 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate-Judge John E Ott: Motion Hearing held on 7/22/2011 re: dft's motion to dismiss and pla's opposition to motion - ORDER (oral) dictated into the record by the court- written order to be entered by the court- hrg adj. (Court Reporter C. Sinkfield.) (DDR)
July 12, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER setting motion hearing on #2 defendant's Motion to Dismiss and plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct for Friday, July 22, 2011, at 10:30 a.m., before the undersigned in Courtroom 3B at the Hugo L. Black United States Courthouse in Birmingham, Alabama. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on July 12, 2011. (AMC)
May 27, 2011 Filing 8 RESPONSE in Support re #2 MOTION to Dismiss and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; and Motion, in the Alternative, to Stay filed by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Higey, Todd)
May 23, 2011 MOTION for leave to Amend Complaint (see document #7 , entered as a response in opposition instead of a motion to amend complaint) (KGE)
May 20, 2011 Filing 7 Motion to Amend Complaint filed by Stephanie Sue Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(McDonald, Kerry) Modified text on 5/23/2011 (KGE, ).
May 12, 2011 PHV Fee paid for atty's M Scott McIntyre, Angela M Hayden and John Lewis, $150.00, receipt number B4601022936 (KGE, )
May 11, 2011 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice contingent upon payment of the required fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E. Ott on 05/11/2011. (KPL, )
May 10, 2011 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Admission Pro Hac Vice by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Affidavit)(Higey, Todd)
May 6, 2011 Filing 5 SUBMISSION ORDER Now before this court is a Motion to Dismiss filed on 5/6/11, by Dft CSX Transportation, Inc. #2 . The pla shall file any opposition or other response to the dfts motion on or before 5/20/11. The dft shall file any reply thereto, if necessary, on or before 5/27/11. Signed by Magistrate-Judge John E Ott on 5/6/11. (KGE)
May 6, 2011 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Higey, Todd)
May 6, 2011 Filing 3 RESPONSE in Support re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Higey, Todd)
May 6, 2011 Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Higey, Todd)
March 3, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CSX Transportation, Inc. (Filing fee $350 receipt #B4601020735) filed by Stephanie Sue Carlson.(KGE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Sue Carlson
Represented By: Kerry R McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Represented By: Todd M Higey
Represented By: Angela M Hayden
Represented By: Morris Wade Richardson
Represented By: M Scott McIntyre
Represented By: John B Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?