Harris v. Tyson Foods, Inc
Plaintiff: Sheila F Harris
Defendant: Tyson Foods, Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv01809
Filed: May 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: Walker
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: As further set out in M.O. and Order, the court GRANTS Defendant Tyson's Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiff Harris' claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 12/28/12. (CVA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Tyson Foods, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyson Foods, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila F Harris
Represented By: Lisa M Ivey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?