Booker v. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company et al

Plaintiff: Anthony Carl Booker
Defendant: Stonebridge Life Insurance Company and Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2011cv02686
Filed: July 27, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: William M Acker
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Booker v. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Lewis Conrad Anderson, IV
Represented By: Christopher Yeilding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: Matthew R Griffith
Represented By: Steven K Herndon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Carl Booker
Represented By: John E Medaris
Represented By: Joseph A Fawal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?