Garnett v. Holder

Plaintiff: Danny Lee Garnett
Defendant: Eric H Holder, Jr
Case Number: 2:2011cv03559
Filed: October 5, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Etowah
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 31, 2013 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: As further set out in MO and Order, 8 , Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, is GRANTED. The court finds that Garnett has failed to state any claims against Holder upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, all of Garnett's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 01/31/13. (CVA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garnett v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric H Holder, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Lee Garnett
Represented By: Scott T Morro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?