Duke et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C.
| Kent Duke and Jacqueline C Duke |
| Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C. |
| 2:2012cv00157 |
| January 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Shelby |
| William M Acker |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court ORDERS defendant Nationstar to produce the aforementioned items to plaintiffs by January 22, 2013. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 1/15/13. (KGE, )
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 41 , Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration, is granted in part and denied in part, as further set out in order. The new deadline for delivery of in camera documents is 12/27/12. 31 , Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel, to the extent not heretofore granted, is DENIED. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 11/16/12. (CVA)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER the order of 3/15/12, is AMENDED pursuant to Rule 54(b) to direct the entry of final judgment in favor of MorEquity and against plas, Kent Duke and spouse, Jacqueline C. Duke; DENYING 22 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Res Judicata; DENYING 26 MOTION to Strike 25 Response in Opposition to Motion. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 8/30/12. (KGE, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
