Blakenship v. Chemical Lime Company of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff: Ronny Blakenship
Defendant: Chemical Lime Company of Alabama, LLC
Case Number: 2:2012cv00984
Filed: March 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: James H Hancock
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 9/23/2013. (KAM, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blakenship v. Chemical Lime Company of Alabama, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronny Blakenship
Represented By: Allen Durham Arnold
Represented By: David R Arendall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chemical Lime Company of Alabama, LLC
Represented By: Daniel E Harrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?