Maye v. Thomas et al
||Antwain Vontell Maye
||Kim Thomas, Price, Hicks, Gary and Roderick Gadson
||staff attorney 3
||July 17, 2012
||Alabama Northern District Court
||Robert B Propst
||T Michael Putnam
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 20, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on April 28, 2015. No objections have been filed by any party. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defe ndant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant Gadson's motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 5/20/15. (CTS, )
|August 13, 2014
ORDER -re: R&R 10 . The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that all of the pltf's claims except his Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against dft Gadson and his supervisory liability claim against dft Gary are DISMISSED. The remaining claims are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 8/13/2014.(AVC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?