Jones v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Company
||Novartis Pharmaceuticals Company
||April 4, 2013
||Alabama Northern District Court
||Virginia Emerson Hopkins
|Nature of Suit:
||Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 26, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 204 Opposition to Bill Of Costs and 198 Bill of Costs filed by Ernesteen Jones. For the reasons stated, the Bill of Costs is due to be GRANTED in part and otherwise DENIED. NPC is hereby AWARDED $8,035.25 in costs. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 7/26/2018. (KWC)
|February 10, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/10/2017. (JLC)
|January 26, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 108 MOTION to Strike Expert Testimony of Dr. Suzanne Parisian to the extent that it seeks to exclude Dr. Parisian's testimony in its entirety. However, Novartis' Motion is due to be GRANTED IN PA RT and DENIED IN PART as to the particular areas of Dr. Parisian's testimony that it seeks to exclude. GRANTING 112 MOTION to Strike Expert Testimony of Dr. William B. Hinshaw, GRANTING 116 MOTION to Strike Expert Testimony of Wayn e A. Taylor, Ph.D., GRANTING 118 MOTION to Strike Expert Testimony of Non-retained Experts to the extent that either expert intends to offer an opinion on causation and is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 1/26/2017. (JLC)
|July 2, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 7/2/2013. (JLC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?