Carpenter v. United States of America

Petitioner: Timothy Terrill Carpenter
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2013cv08043
Filed: September 30, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Referring Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 21, 2016 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 9/21/2016. (PSM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carpenter v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Terrill Carpenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Melissa Kay Atwood
Represented By: Gregory R Dimler
Represented By: Joyce White Vance, US Attorney
Represented By: Alice H Martin
Represented By: Joseph Paul Montminy
Represented By: William Gott Simpson
Represented By: James A Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?