Taul v. Nagel Enterprises, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Barry Taul
Defendant: Nagel Enterprises, Inc. and Jed Nagel
Movant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2014cv00061
Filed: January 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 235 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Before the Court are four motions: (1) Plaintiffs Motion To Substitute Party Defendant and Appoint Administrator Ad Litem (doc. 226 ) (the Motion To Appoint Administrator Ad Litem) filed on November 5, 2018; (2) Plain tiffs Supplemental Motion To Substitute Party Defendant and Appoint Administrator Ad Litem (doc. 230 ) (the Supplemental Motion To Appoint Administrator Ad Litem) filed on December 3, 2018; (3) Laura E. Nagels Motion for Substitution (doc. 233 ) fi led on December 19, 2018; and (4) Plaintiffs Renewed Motion To Substitute Party Defendant and Appoint Administrator Ad Litem (doc. 234 ) (the Renewed Motion To Appoint Administrator Ad Litem) filed on December 20, 2018. Because Plaintiff filed his R enewed Motion To Appoint Administrator Ad Litem, which includes the arguments he made in his previous two motions, his Motion To Appoint Administrator Ad Litem and his Supplemental Motion To Appoint Administrator Ad Litem are DENIED AS MOOT. For the reasons stated in this Opinion, Ms. Nagels Motion for Substitution is due to be GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Renewed Motion To Appoint Administrator Ad Litem is due to be DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/20/2019. (KEK)
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 138 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 136 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as set out herein. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 1/2/2018. (JLC)
November 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 116 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court DISMISSES Barry Taul's claim for post-termination retaliation under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 11/1/2017. (JLC)
February 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 85 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, DENYING 86 MOTION to Quash, DENYING 87 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Objections to Plaintiff's 2nd Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production, DENYING 88 MOTION to Amend/Correct, DENYING 96 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Plaintiff's Surreply, DENYING 97 MOTION for Leave to File Corrected Motion to file a Response to Pl aintiff's Surreply to Defendants' 2nd Motion to Dismiss. Both parties are hereby ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report regarding the status of Nagel's Alabama criminal case, including any appeals by February 10, 2017. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/1/2017. (JLC)
January 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 1/25/2016. (JLC)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 15 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Nagel Enterprises, Inc., Jed Nagel. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order reflecting its determinations on deadlines for the referenced Discovery and Hearing. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/17/2014. (JLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taul v. Nagel Enterprises, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry Taul
Represented By: Jere L Beasley
Represented By: Larry A Golston, Jr
Represented By: Wilson Daniel Miles, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nagel Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph H Rutledge, II
Represented By: W Eugene Rutledge
Represented By: Gregory F Yaghmai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jed Nagel
Represented By: Joseph H Rutledge, II
Represented By: W Eugene Rutledge
Represented By: Gregory F Yaghmai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: United States of America
Represented By: Thomas E Borton, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?