Constable v. Lambert

Plaintiff: Arthur Willis Constable
Defendant: Deortha Jo Lambert
Case Number: 2:2014cv00409
Filed: March 7, 2014
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 14, 2016 30 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER As outlined and for the reasons discussed within, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Plaintiff's motion to strike and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Defendants motion for summary judgment. This matter will proceed regarding the Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/14/16. (SAC )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Constable v. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Willis Constable
Represented By: G Daniel Evans
Represented By: Alexandria Parrish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deortha Jo Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?