Caudle v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
Plaintiff: Vanessa Caudle
Defendant: Honda Retirement Plan, Plan No. 334, Honda manufacturing Health & Welfare Benefits Plan, Plan No. 501, CIGNA Corporation, Life Insurance Company of North America and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv00545
Filed: March 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Eastern Office
County: Talladega
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, GRANTING 16 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING 17 MOTION to Dismiss, TERMED AS MOOT 26 MOTION for Leave to Conduct Limi ted Jurisdictional Discovery, GRANTING 20 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint, GRANTING 14 MOTION to Dismiss. Further, Ms. Caudle is HEREBY ORDERED, no later than July 21, 2014, to replead her complaint in a non-shotgun, non-conclusory, and otherwise plausible format that is consistent with the foregoing rulings. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 6/27/2014. (JLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caudle v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honda Retirement Plan, Plan No. 334
Represented By: Stephen J Bumgarner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honda manufacturing Health & Welfare Benefits Plan, Plan No. 501
Represented By: Stephen J Bumgarner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CIGNA Corporation
Represented By: Katherine L Soppet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Represented By: Katherine L Soppet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Represented By: Stephen J Bumgarner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa Caudle
Represented By: Thomas O Sinclair
Represented By: Miles Clayborn Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?