Jefferson County Board of Education, The v. M. et al
| Jefferson County Board of Education, The |
| Bryan M. and Darcy M. |
| 2:2014cv01064 |
| June 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons stated above, the Court DISMISSES the Boards claims WITH PREJUDICE. With the exception of the claim for attorneys fees, the Court DISMISSES Bryan and Darcys claims WITH PREJUDICE. On or before October 27, 2016, Br yan and Darcy shall submit to the Court evidence of their attorneys fees attributable to the due process proceedings. The Board may respond with arguments for limiting those fees on or before November 7, 2016. Bryan and Darcy may reply on or before November 14, 2016. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 10/13/2016. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The Jefferson County Board of Education is not an arm of the state, and therefore it is not entitled to sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment for purposes of this IDEA proceeding. The Court DENIES the Boards motion to dismiss Bryan and Darcys counterclaim. (Doc. 12). Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/21/2015. (KEK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
