Robinson v. Hueytown Police Department et al
| Calvin Lee Robinson |
| Chuck Hagler, L B Rankin, Todd Easterwood and City of Hueytown |
| 2:2014cv01886 |
| October 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons discussed above, the Court enters judgment in favor of Officer Easterwood on Mr. Robinsons § 1983 claim. The Court also enters judgment in favor of Officer Easterwood and Lieutenant Rankin on Mr. Robinsons wrongful death claims. The Court will enter a separate order closing this case. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/26/2018. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the defendants motion to dismiss. Mr. Robinson is ORDERED to amend his first amended complaint within fourteen days to add factual allegations to suppor t his § 1983 training and supervision claim against the City of Hueytown and Officer Hagler in Count II. If he does not do so, the Court will deem the claim abandoned. Mr. Robinsons remaining claims may proceed forward. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/30/2015. (KEK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
