Litaker v. Hoover Board of Education et al
||Hoover Board of Education, Andy Craig and Carol Barber
||November 10, 2014
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||Madeline Hughes Haikala
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 2000
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 29, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons explained above, no genuine issue of material fact exists with respect to the following claims: (1) Ms. Litakers Title VII claim against Mr. Craig; (2) Ms. Litakers § 1983 due process claim against Ms. Barber in her official and individual capacity; (3) Ms. Litakers § 1983 due process claim against Mr. Craig in his official capacity; (4) Ms. Litakers breach of contract claim against the Board; and (5) Ms. Litakers defamation claim against Mr. Craig and Ms. Barber. Therefore, the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on these claims. Genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on Ms. Litakers Title VII claim against the Board and her § 1983 due process claim against the Board and Mr. Craig in his individual capacity. By separate order, the Court will set these claims for a jury trial. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/29/2017. (KEK)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?