Gregory et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
||Jonathan Gregory and Amy Gregory
||Select Portfolio Servicing Inc, Bank of America NA and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
||May 8, 2015
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||John H England
|Nature of Suit:
||Truth in Lending
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 31, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Accordingly, Defendants motion to dismiss, (doc. 22), is GRANTED, and Counts I through V and VII through XIV of the Gregorys amended complaint are DISMISSED. Specifically, the abandoned claims in Co unts III, VIII, IX, and XIV; the preempted state-law claims relating to the responsibilities of persons who furnish information to consumer reporting agencies; the negligence and wantonness claims in Counts I and II purportedly based on RESPA or the obligations arising from the mortgage contracts; the state-law wrongful foreclosure claim under Count IV; and the time-barred claims under Count X are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. To the extent the Gregorys can re-plead the other claims consisten t with this Order, those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Gregorys have until September 14, 2016, to file a motion to amend with a proposed second amended complaint consistent with this Order. If the Gregorys do not file a mo tion to amend by that date (or have not otherwise sought to extend the deadline), the claims for which leave to amend was granted will be deemed abandoned and dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 8/31/2016. (KEK)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?