Crockett v. Progressive Specialty Ins Co

Plaintiff: C Taylor Crockett
Defendant: Progressive Specialty Ins Co
Case Number: 2:2015cv01197
Filed: July 16, 2015
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2017 26 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- The deft's amended motion for partial summary judgment concerning pltf's claim for lost business profits (Doc 14 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 3/31/17. (MRR, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crockett v. Progressive Specialty Ins Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C Taylor Crockett
Represented By: Alan B Lasseter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Specialty Ins Co
Represented By: Patrick W Franklin
Represented By: Paul Albert Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?