Minnifield v. City of Birmingham Department of Police et al
| Montague Minnifield |
| City of Birmingham Department of Police and Sergeant Heath Boackle |
| 2:2016cv00196 |
| February 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Because the summary judgment evidence has not changed, the law of the case dictates that that evidence does not suffice to create a jury question concerning adversity. Accordingly, by separate order, the Court will enter judgment for the City of Birmingham on Officer Minnifield's remaining Title VII claims because Officer Minnifield has not established a prima facie case of discrimination or retaliation. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/25/2021. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons discussed above, the Court DENIES the defendants motion to strike. (Doc. 65). Additionally, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the defendants motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 41). The Court strikes Mr. Minnifields demand for punitive damages from the City. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 3/30/2018. (KEK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
