Woodruff v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al

Plaintiff: Jeffrey Woodruff
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and Southern Company Services, Inc. Healthcare Plan
Case Number: 2:2016cv00281
Filed: February 18, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodruff v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Woodruff
Represented By: Jeffrey Stuart Daniel(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama
Represented By: Mary Ann Couch(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Leigh Anne Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Company Services, Inc. Healthcare Plan
Represented By: Christopher L Yeilding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?