The Boeing Company v. Tenenbaum Capital Partners, LLC
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 13, 2017
ORDER-re: Report and Recommendation 301 . The court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Special Master, with certain deadlines modified by agreement of the parties. It is ORDERED that the Motion to Strike is MOOT. The Mot ion to Compel is DENIED to the extent that it seeks immediate production of the Disputed Documents; however, Boeing's Motion to compel is GRANTED to the extent that Boeing is entitled to any Disputed Documents not protected by the attorney-clien t privilege and/or the work product doctrine. TCP's Motion to Quash and AAI's Motion to Quash are DENIED to the extent that those Motions seek the wholesale rejection of Boeing's entitlement to the production of the Disputed Documents; however, TCP's Motion to Quash and AAI's Motion to Quash are GRANTED to the extent that the Motions seeks to establish that Boeing may be prevented from obtaining some or all of the Disputed Documents because such documents are potentially protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine. TCP/AAI is required to produce a supplemental privilege log by 1/13/2017. If Boeing still wishes to challenge any of the renewed assertions, it may do so by filing specific, document-by-document challenges by 2/10/2017. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/13/2017. (AVC)
|November 22, 2016
ORDER-re: Report and Recommendation (Case No. 2:11-cv-03577-RDP, doc# 285; Case No. 2:16-mc-01216-RDP, doc#43). The court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the Recommendations of the Special Master. It is ORDERED that Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC's Motion for Sanctions and Cost Sharing is DENIED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/22/2016. (AVC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?