Agundis v. Rice et al
Case Number: 2:2017cv00536
Filed: April 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John E Ott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MEMORANDUM OPINION - Premised on the foregoing, the defendants motions to dismiss (doc. 76 & 78) are due to be granted as to all the claims regardless of whether they are brought against Rice in his individual or official capacity. Additionally, the court finds that the defendants motion to strike Agundiss reply brief (doc. 89) is moot. An appropriate order will be entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 7/13/2018. (KEK)
April 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER ADOPTING 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dfts' 30 , 37 , 39 , 44 Amended Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED as to Dfts Oktimbbeha County Sheriff's Department, Judge Dorothy Colom, City of Columbus Police Department, Sheriff Steven Gladney & Chief Oscar Lewis. This action, along w/John Rice's Motion to Dismiss, is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Alabama. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 4/3/2017. (tot) [Transferred from Alabama Southern on 4/5/2017.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Agundis v. Rice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?