Reddick v. Republic Parking System

Reddick v. Republic Parking System

Plaintiff:	Lekisha Reddick
Defendant:	Republic Parking System
Case Number:	2:2017cv00728
Filed:	May 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office:	Southern Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Karon O Bowdre
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 25, 2019	Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 6/25/2019. (JLC)
March 25, 2019	Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION - This race and sex discrimination and retaliation case comes before the court on Defendant Republic Parking Systems motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 26 ). By separate order, the court will DENY IN PART and GRANT IN PART Republi cs motion for summary judgment. The court will DENY the motion for summary judgment on Ms. Reddicks race discrimination claim based on the failure to promote her to Assistant Manager in July 2014. The court will GRANT the motion for summary judgment on Ms. Reddicks race and sex discrimination claims based on the April 2015 failure to promote and on her retaliation claim. Also, by separate order, the court will sua sponte order Ms. Reddick to show cause why the court should not find her 2014 failure to promote claim time-barred for failure to timely file an EEOC charge. The court will allow Republic to file a brief in response and Ms. Reddick an opportunity to reply. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/25/2019. (KEK)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 25, 2019

Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 6/25/2019. (JLC)

March 25, 2019

Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION - This race and sex discrimination and retaliation case comes before the court on Defendant Republic Parking Systems motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 26 ). By separate order, the court will DENY IN PART and GRANT IN PART Republi cs motion for summary judgment. The court will DENY the motion for summary judgment on Ms. Reddicks race discrimination claim based on the failure to promote her to Assistant Manager in July 2014. The court will GRANT the motion for summary judgment on Ms. Reddicks race and sex discrimination claims based on the April 2015 failure to promote and on her retaliation claim. Also, by separate order, the court will sua sponte order Ms. Reddick to show cause why the court should not find her 2014 failure to promote claim time-barred for failure to timely file an EEOC charge. The court will allow Republic to file a brief in response and Ms. Reddick an opportunity to reply. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/25/2019. (KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reddick v. Republic Parking System
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lekisha Reddick
Represented By:	Roderick T Cooks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Republic Parking System
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?