Belevich v. Thomas et al
Valentin Belevich |
Klavdia Thomas and Tatiana Kuznitsnyna |
2:2017cv01193 |
July 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Southern Office |
Jefferson |
T Michael Putnam |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 6/20/2019. (JLC) |
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Having shown good cause that discovery related to his criminal charges would cause undue burden, expense, and would implicate his Fifth Amendment right, the Plaintiff's motion for a protective order 40 is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Defendants are barred from requesting any discovery in the above-captioned case, whether written or oral, regarding or relating to any pending criminal charges against Valentin Belevich or to the allegations forming the basis of those charges. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 12/18/2018. (AFS) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the Plaintiff's 29 motion to dismiss the Defendants' amended counterclaims is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Defendants' 33 amended counterclaims 56-60 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 11/7/2018. (AFS) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 6 First MOTION to Dismiss. Defendants have 21 days from the entry date of this Order to enter an Answer, as required by Rule 12(a) of the FRCP. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 3/9/2018. (JLC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.