Brawley v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
| Glen L Brawley |
| Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, Jack Wright and Robert F Kerr |
| 2:2017cv01513 |
| September 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Virginia Emerson Hopkins |
| JU B UnassignedB |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Northwesterns motion for summary judgment. The court GRANTS Northwesterns motion for summary judgment on Counts II through IV of the complaint, GRANTS IN PART Northwesterns mo tion for summary judgment on Count V of the complaint to the extent the count asserts a claim arising from Northwesterns February 2015 denial of benefits, and DENIES IN PART Northwesterns motion for summary judgment on Count V of the complaint to the extent the count asserts a claim arising from Northwesterns June 2016 denial of benefits. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 12/21/2018. (TLM, )
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 11 MOTION to Remand and GRANTING 8 MOTION to Dismiss of Defendants Jack Wright and Robert F. Kerr. To the extent that Messrs. Kerr and Wright have requested a with-prejudice dismissal, that portion of their Dismissal Motion is DENIED as set out herein. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 12/21/2017. (JLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
