Ellis v. Arron et al
| Davon L Ellis |
| J Gunn and L Aaron |
| 2:2017cv01726 |
| October 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| John H England |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER-Based on the foregoing, defendant Officer Gunns motion for summary judgment 55 is GRANTED. Defendant Sgt. Aarons motion for summary judgment 51 is DENIED. Counsel for Ellis and counsel for Sgt. Aaron should file a joint status report by August 17, 2020, informing the court whether they believe this case would benefit from mediation or if they are ready to begin pretrial proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 08/03/2020. (AKD)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. The court ORDERS that the defendants' motion for summary judgment 25 is GRANTED as to the claims against the defendants in their of ficial capacities, and DENIED as to the claims against the defendants in their individual capacities. The plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief are DISMISSED. The remaining claims, for excessive force against the defendants in their official capacities, are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 10/1/2018. (AFS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
