Chatman v. Roy et al
| Stanley Brent Chatman |
| Kennedy D Roy and Mohammad Jenkins |
| 2:2017cv01952 |
| November 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 1/27/2020. (JLC)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED and the recommendations are ACCEPTED. The court ORDERS the Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the 14th Amendment excessive force claims, the eighth amendment excessive force claims based on allegations Roysprayed Chatman's cell with a fire extinguisher and Jenkins used Sabre Red Cellbuster, and any constitutional claim based on Roy's refusal to allow Chatman to use the phon e. These claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to the eighth amendment excessive force claims based on Roy's alleged use of the fire extinguisher to spray Chatman in the face and Jenkins' alleged assault on Chatman in the hallway by slapping him and spaying a chemical agent in his face. These claims areREFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 9/23/2019. (AFS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
