Warren v. Coosa Board of Education et al
| Douglas Keith Warren |
| Coosa Board of Education, Randall Hardiman, Tiffany McCain, David Tuck, Donna McVey, Gay Adams, Andi Wilson, Dennis R Sanford and Bradley Delynn Bouldin |
| 2:2017cv01977 |
| November 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Talladega |
| L Scott Coogler |
| JU B UnassignedB |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons explained above, the court WILL GRANT Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Mr. Warren's § 1981 race discrimination claims and Title VII gender discrimination claims. The court WILL DISMISS the se claims WITH PREJUDICE. Because the court will dismiss all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, the court WILL DISMISS Mr. Warren's defamation claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 10/29/2019. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated above, the defendants motion to dismiss the monetary claim in Count II of the amended complaint for coaching supplements is DENIED. The defendants motion to dismiss Count III of the amended complaint is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 11/15/2018. (KEK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
