Bowman v. City of Birmingham

Bowman v. City of Birmingham

Plaintiff:	Calvin Bowman
Defendant:	City of Birmingham
Case Number:	2:2018cv00364
Filed:	March 7, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office:	Southern Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 7, 2019	Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER consistent with this opinion the City's MOTION to Strike 41 is GRANTED solely as to paragraphs 15 and 17 of Bowman's November 2018 affidavit, and Bowman's MOTION to Strike 49 is DENIED< /b>. Therefore, the court STRIKES paragraphs 15 and 17 and the Clerk is DIRECTED to seal Bowman's November 2018 Affidavit, docs 36 and 41-1. Bowman's motion for summary judgment, 35 is DENIED, and the City's mo tion, 32 is GRANTED solely as to the retaliation claims related to the threat of termination, overall Crossplex events manager role, maintenance manager role, and cashier role assignment. Accordingly, these four claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pretrial Conference set for 2/8/2019 at 2:30 PM; Jury Trial set for 3/18/2019 at 9:00 AM; BOTH in the Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 2/7/2019. (AFS)
July 10, 2018	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 3 MOTION to Dismiss solely as to the allegations of conduct Bowman could have challenged in Bowman I, in all other respects the motion is DENIED; RENDERING MOOT 5 MOTION to Stay. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 7/10/2018. (AFS)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 7, 2019

Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER consistent with this opinion the City's MOTION to Strike 41 is GRANTED solely as to paragraphs 15 and 17 of Bowman's November 2018 affidavit, and Bowman's MOTION to Strike 49 is DENIED< /b>. Therefore, the court STRIKES paragraphs 15 and 17 and the Clerk is DIRECTED to seal Bowman's November 2018 Affidavit, docs 36 and 41-1. Bowman's motion for summary judgment, 35 is DENIED, and the City's mo tion, 32 is GRANTED solely as to the retaliation claims related to the threat of termination, overall Crossplex events manager role, maintenance manager role, and cashier role assignment. Accordingly, these four claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pretrial Conference set for 2/8/2019 at 2:30 PM; Jury Trial set for 3/18/2019 at 9:00 AM; BOTH in the Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 2/7/2019. (AFS)

July 10, 2018

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 3 MOTION to Dismiss solely as to the allegations of conduct Bowman could have challenged in Bowman I, in all other respects the motion is DENIED; RENDERING MOOT 5 MOTION to Stay. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 7/10/2018. (AFS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowman v. City of Birmingham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Calvin Bowman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Birmingham
Represented By:	Elizabeth H Huntley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?