Moore v. Gordy et al
Charles Arther Moore |
Christopher Gordy and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The |
2:2018cv01090 |
July 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Southern Office |
Lawrence |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Staci G Cornelius |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Respondents's ANSWER to Complaint by Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The, Christopher Gordy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N - Part 1, #15 Exhibit N - Part 2, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T, #22 Exhibit U, #23 Exhibit V, #24 Exhibit W, #25 Exhibit X, #26 Exhibit Y, #27 Exhibit Z, #28 Exhibit AA, #29 Exhibit BB)(Dill, William) |
|
Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The, Christopher Gordy. (Dill, William) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by William D Dill on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The, Christopher Gordy (Dill, William) |
|
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Arther Moore. (Received Filing fee of $5.00, receipt number B4601090583)(KWC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.