Tradestation Securities Inc v. Theis et al
Plaintiff: Tradestation Securities Inc
Defendant: Bret Theis and Paolo Arrigo
Case Number: 2:2018cv01093
Filed: July 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2018 Filing 13 Alias Summons Returned Unexecuted (REFUSED) by Tradestation Securities Inc. as to Bret Theis. (JLC)
September 6, 2018 Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Tradestation Securities Inc as to Bret Theis. (KEK)
August 23, 2018 Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Bret Theis. (MRR, )
August 17, 2018 Filing 10 Alias Summons Issued as to Bret Theis, sent via certified mail (MRR, )
August 14, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Paolo Arrigo, returned to pltf for service (MRR, )
August 13, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Bret Theis served (no signature or date entered on green card) (MRR, )
August 8, 2018 Filing 7 Alias Summons Issued as to Bret Theis, sent via certified mail (MRR, )
August 3, 2018 Filing 6 ALIAS Summons Issued as to Bret Theis. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK)
August 2, 2018 Filing 5 Alias Summons Issued as to Bret Theis, returned to pltf for service (MRR, )
July 26, 2018 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tradestation Securities Inc. filed by Tradestation Securities Inc (Winningham, Donald)
July 19, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bret Theis mailed certified mail. (AFS)
July 17, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, )
July 17, 2018 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3131880 (B4601090603). related document #1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tradestation Securities Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(MRR, ). (Winningham, Donald) Modified on 7/18/2018 (MRR, ).
July 16, 2018 Request for service by certified mail within the body of the complaint filed by Tradestation Securities Inc. (MRR, )
July 16, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tradestation Securities Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(MRR, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tradestation Securities Inc v. Theis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tradestation Securities Inc
Represented By: Donald F Winningham, III
Represented By: Andrea Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bret Theis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paolo Arrigo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?