Banks v. Pappas Restaurants Inc
Austin Banks |
Pappas Restaurants Inc |
2:2018cv01293 |
August 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Southern Office |
Tuscaloosa |
R David Proctor |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 ad |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER denying w/o prejudice #9 Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants Affirmative Defenses; On or before October 19, 2018, the parties SHALL file a joint report informing the court of the date on which the parties will meet to examine the facilities at issue in this case and identifying the persons who will be present at that meeting.. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/11/2018. (KAM) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge R David Proctor: Status Conference held on 10/11/2018. (JLC) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Pappas Restaurants Inc. (Bullock, Virginia) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Virginia Druhan Bullock on behalf of Pappas Restaurants Inc (Bullock, Virginia) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER This case is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint #9 . This case is SET for a status conference in the chambers of the undersigned on October 11, 2018 at 9:30 am. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/2/2018. (KAM) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Austin Banks. (Taylor, Cassie) |
Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/10/2018. (KAM) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pappas Restaurants Inc. filed by Pappas Restaurants Inc (Yuengert, Anne) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Pappas Restaurants Inc.(Yuengert, Anne) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Austin Banks. Pappas Restaurants Inc served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018. (KAM) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Pappas Restaurants Inc. mailed certified mail (KAM) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601091328 (KAM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Austin Banks (KAM, ) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Austin Banks. (KAM, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Papas Restaurants Inc, filed by Austin Banks.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Banks v. Pappas Restaurants Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Austin Banks | |
Represented By: | L Landis Sexton |
Represented By: | Cassie Elizabeth Taylor |
Represented By: | Tracy Gwyn Birdsong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pappas Restaurants Inc | |
Represented By: | Virginia Druhan Bullock |
Represented By: | Anne R Yuengert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.