Hunt v. LifeMap Assurance Company
| Keely Hunt |
| LifeMap Assurance Company |
| 2:2018cv01357 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| R David Proctor |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER This matter is before the court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Complaint #7 . The motion #7 is GRANTED. Defendant SHALL file a responsive pleading on or before October 26, 2018. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/10/2018. (KAM)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by LifeMap Assurance Company. (Yeilding, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keely Hunt. LifeMap Assurance Company served on 9/21/2018, answer due 10/12/2018. (KEK) |
| Filing 5 ALIAS Summons Issued as to LifeMap Assurance Company. Sent via certified mail. (KEK) |
| Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Keely Hunt as to LifeMap Assurance Company. (KAM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to LifeMap Assurance Company mailed certified mail (KAM) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Keely Hunt. (Burke, Peter) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3162712. related document #1 COMPLAINT against LifeMap Assurance Company, filed by Keely Hunt. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit AA, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit BB, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit CC, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Exhibit E, # 9 Exhibit F, # 10 Exhibit G, # 11 Exhibit H, # 12 Exhibit I, # 13 Exhibit J, # 14 Exhibit K, # 15 Exhibit L, # 16 Exhibit M, # 17 Exhibit N, # 18 Exhibit O, # 19 Exhibit P, # 20 Exhibit Q, # 21 Exhibit R, # 22 Exhibit S, # 23 Exhibit T, # 24 Exhibit U, # 25 Exhibit V, # 26 Exhibit W, # 27 Exhibit X, # 28 Exhibit Y, # 29 Exhibit Z)(KEK). (Burke, Peter) NDAL rec # B601091609. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LifeMap Assurance Company, filed by Keely Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit AA, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit BB, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit CC, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I, #13 Exhibit J, #14 Exhibit K, #15 Exhibit L, #16 Exhibit M, #17 Exhibit N, #18 Exhibit O, #19 Exhibit P, #20 Exhibit Q, #21 Exhibit R, #22 Exhibit S, #23 Exhibit T, #24 Exhibit U, #25 Exhibit V, #26 Exhibit W, #27 Exhibit X, #28 Exhibit Y, #29 Exhibit Z)(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunt v. LifeMap Assurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keely Hunt | |
| Represented By: | Peter H Burke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LifeMap Assurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Christopher L Yeilding |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
