Taylor v. Crannford et al
| Christopher A Taylor |
| Megan Crannford and Hadassah Underwood |
| 2:2018cv01371 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| T Michael Putnam |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER terming motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 10/3/2018. (PSM)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to Notice of Deficient Pleading re #3 filed by Christopher A Taylor. (TLM, ) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is deficient for the reason(s) indicated within. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this order, in the manner explained within. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 8/30/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(PSM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher A Taylor. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Megan Crannford, Hadassah Underwood, filed by Christopher A Taylor.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
