Beglin v. Neon Work Force Technologies Inc et al
| Ronald W Beglin |
| Shannon Scott, Neon Work Force Technologies Inc and Mike McCullers |
| 2:2018cv01417 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Regarding the two individual defendants, Mr. Beglin alleges that Shannon Scott and Mike McCullers are residents of Alabama. (Doc. 1, 3-4). These jurisdictional allegations are insufficient to establish that the Court has jurisdiction over this case. These pleading defects must be cured before the Court may determine whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this dispute.2 On or before October 12, 2018, Mr. Beglin shall correct the flaws in his jurisdictional allegations. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 10/2/2018. (KEK)
|
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3168425 (ALND B4601091863) related document #1 COMPLAINT against Mike McCullers, Neon Work Force Technologies Inc, Shannon Scott, filed by Ronald W Beglin.(KEK). (Dodd, Hube) Modified on 9/7/2018 (KEK). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike McCullers, Neon Work Force Technologies Inc, Shannon Scott, filed by Ronald W Beglin.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
