Floyd v. Internal Revenue Service et al
Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos |
Anthony James Floyd |
2:2018cv01516 |
September 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John H England |
R David Proctor |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Petition to Quash Third-Party Summons by Internal Revenue Service, Robert De Los Santos. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support of United States' Motion to Summarily Dismiss Petition to Quash Third-Party Summons, #2 Affidavit of Robert De Los Santos)(Sholian, Margaret) |
Filing Fee received from Anthony Floyd in the amount of $47.00, receipt number B4601092855. (JLC) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT Case Reassigned to Judge R David Proctor. Magistrate Judge John H England, III no longer assigned to the case. Please use 2:18-cv-1516-RDP on all subsequent pleadings. (AFS) |
|
Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 9/17/2018. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Anthony James Floyd. (AFS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition to Quash 3rd Party Summons against Internal Revenue Service, Robert De Los Santos, filed by Anthony James Floyd.(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.