Hargrove v. Diversified Consultants Inc
| Robert Lee Hargrove, III |
| Diversified Consultants Inc |
| 2:2018cv01552 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Karon O Bowdre |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER. Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (doc. 13), the court ORDERS that this case be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, in its entirety, WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear his or its own costs. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 11/19/2018. (FNC)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint by Diversified Consultants Inc. filed by Diversified Consultants Inc (Nettles, Laura) |
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER. Prior to reassignment, the court stayed this action through November 16, 2018. (Doc. 8). The stay remains in effect through November 16, 2018. The parties SHALL FILE a joint status report on or before November 15, 2018 informing the court of the status of this case and the parties' progress on settlement. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 10/29/2018.(MCP).
|
| Filing 11 Notice of Reassignment- Because the parties have not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Karon O. Bowdre. Please use case number 2:18-cv-1552-KOB on all subsequent pleadings. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE: the telephone status conference set for 10:00 a.m. on October 22, 2018, is CANCELLED. (KEK) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: A telephone status conference is currently set for 10:00 a.m. on October 22, 2018. (Doc. #5 ). The parties are REMINDED that the status conference will be cancelled by separate order if, prior to the date of the conference, all parties submit forms indicating whether they consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/19/2018. (MSN)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER: The plaintiff has filed a notice of settlement requesting a 45-day stay of this action while the parties finalize the resolution of their dispute. (Doc. #7 ). The request is GRANTED, and this action is STAYED through November 16, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/9/18. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Robert Lee Hargrove, III. (KEK) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26 - The parties are reminded to conduct a conference pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties must confer no later than twenty-one (21) days after the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/26/2018. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order for Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by no later than November 5, 2018. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case without further order after November 5, 2018. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:00 A.M. on October 22, 2018. The parties are DIRECTED to dial 877-336-1831 five minutes before the status conference begins. The access code is 2778178. If all parties submit an executed consent forms before the date of the status conference, the status conference will be cancelled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/26/2018. (KEK)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Diversified Consultants Inc. filed by Diversified Consultants Inc (Nettles, Laura) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Diversified Consultants Inc.(Nettles, Laura) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diversified Consultants Inc from Shelby County Small Claims Court, case number SM18-261., filed by Diversified Consultants Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(MRR, ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3178727 (B4601092188). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diversified Consultants Inc from Shelby County Small Claims Court, case number SM18-261., filed by Diversified Consultants Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(MRR, ). (Nettles, Laura) Modified on 9/24/2018 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hargrove v. Diversified Consultants Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Lee Hargrove, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Diversified Consultants Inc | |
| Represented By: | Laura Catherine Nettles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
