White et al v. Walgreen Co
| Debbie B White and Houston Howard White |
| Walgreen Co |
| 2:2018cv01844 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| R David Proctor |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Clark, John) |
Filing 8
QUALIFIED HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/6/2018. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/6/2018. (KAM)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Hipaa Order by Walgreen Co. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Clark, John) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Walgreen Co.(Clark, John) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debbie B White, Houston Howard White. Walgreen Co served on 11/19/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. (KAM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Walgreen Co. mailed certified mail (KAM) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3216022. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Walgreen Co, filed by Debbie B White, Houston Howard White.(KAM). (Gray, William) NDAL rec# B4601093455 Modified on 11/13/2018 (KAM, ). |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Debbie B White, Houston Howard White. (Gray, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walgreen Co, filed by Debbie B White, Houston Howard White.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
