Arrowsmith v. Johnson
Richard T. Arrowsmith |
Robert Bradford Johnson |
2:2018cv01953 |
November 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Liles C Burke |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Appeal of Interlocutory Order by Robert Bradford Johnson. (Hall, Michael) |
Filing 8 SECOND AMENDED BRIEFING letter to counsel. (AHI) |
Filing 7 AMENDED BRIEFING letter to counsel. (AHI) |
Filing 6 BRIEFING letter to counsel. (AHI) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD ON APPEAL (Attachments: #1 Designation of Appellant, #2 Designation of Appelle, #3 Adversary Proceeding Docket Sheet, #4 Main Bankruptcy Case Docket Sheet, #5 Order Denying Motion to Modify Stay, #6 Notice of Appeal, #7 Statement of Issues, #8 Transcript of Hearing held on 10-15-2018, #9 Transcript of Hearing of Motion to Dismiss)***CD of Complete Record maintained with file in Clerk's Office***(AHI) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Richard T. Arrowsmith re #3 Notice (Other) Notice of Withdrawal of Liquidating Trustee's Statement of Issues to be Presented on Appeal (Sparks, Daniel) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Richard T. Arrowsmith Liquidating Trustee's Statement of Issues to be Presented on Appeal (Sparks, Daniel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE - The Bankruptcy Clerk of Court has promptly transmitted a Notice of Appeal to this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8003(d)(1). The court reminds the parties of the requirements of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009. Parties must file with the Bankruptcy Court their designations, transcript(s) and a statement of the issues to complete the record on appeal. When the record on appeal is complete, the Bankruptcy Clerk of Court will transmit the record to this Courts Clerk of Court. The Court will set a briefing schedule following the Bankruptcy Clerk of Court's notice of transmitting the record. At the direction of the court, the parties are directed to comply with the provisions Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009. (AHI) |
Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 18-02395-TOM-11. File received, filed by Richard T. Arrowsmith. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 Order Denying Motion to Modify Stay, #3 Main Bankruptcy Case Docket Sheet, #4 AP 18-230 Docket Sheet)(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arrowsmith v. Johnson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: Richard T. Arrowsmith | |
Represented By: | Bradley R Hightower |
Represented By: | Daniel D Sparks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: Robert Bradford Johnson | |
Represented By: | Marc P Solomon |
Represented By: | Michael L Hall |
Represented By: | Anna Whitney Akers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.