Meredith v. Mastec Inc et al
| Aimee E Meredith |
| Mastec Network Solutions LLC and Mastec Inc |
| 2:2018cv01965 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| T Michael Putnam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 ad |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Aimee E Meredith. (DeFatta, Philip) Modified docket text to reflect the title of the document on 1/25/2019 (MRR, ). |
Filing 14
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 1/18/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than February 23, 2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after February 23, 2019. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:00 am on February 8, 2019. The parties are DIRECTED to call 888-636-3807 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 3676046. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 1/18/19. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mastec Inc, Mastec Network Solutions LLC. filed by Mastec Inc, Mastec Network Solutions LLC (Barlotta, Rachel) |
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule. Any response to the motion to dismiss is due by January 24, 2019. Any reply is due by January 31, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on January 10, 2019. (TNC)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Mastec Inc, Mastec Network Solutions LLC.(Barlotta, Rachel) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Claims Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by Mastec Inc, Mastec Network Solutions LLC. (Barlotta, Rachel) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Defendants' answers due 1/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 12/28/2018. (PMA)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to File Responsive Pleading Motion is RIPE 12/21/2018. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed, by Mastec Inc, Mastec Network Solutions LLC. (Barlotta, Rachel) Modified on 12/21/2018 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Mastec Inc served on 12/10/2018, answer due 12/31/2018. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Mastec Network Solutions LLC served on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/25/2018. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mastec Inc, Mastec Network Solutions LLC., sent via certified mail (MRR, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number H4601003798 (MRR, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Aimee E Meredith. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Aimee E Meredith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
