Shine v. University of Alabama - Birmingham et al
Plaintiff: Michael Shine
Defendant: University of Alabama - Birmingham and Kathy Litzinger
Case Number: 2:2018cv02093
Filed: December 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #6 #7 MOTIONS to Dismiss to refile, after first contacting the Plaintiff, if the Amended Complaint does not correct the deficiencies raised in their Motions. The Court hereby gives Plaintiff until February 28, 2019 to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 2/14/2019. (JLC)
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David R Mellon on behalf of All Defendants (Mellon, David)
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Kathy Litzinger. (Kinderman, Spencer)
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by The Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama (incorrectly named) by University of Alabama - Birmingham. (Kinderman, Spencer)
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed University of Alabama - Birmingham served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (AFS)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kathy Litzinger, University of Alabama - Birmingham mailed certified mail. (AFS)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing Fee: Filing fee $400.00, (ALND B46010946821) receipt_number 1126-3258670. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Kathy Litzinger, University of Alabama - Birmingham, filed by Michael Shine. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC). (Winston, Lee) Modified on 1/17/2019 (AFS).
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by Michael Shine. (Cooks, Roderick)
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Michael Shine. (Cooks, Roderick)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathy Litzinger, University of Alabama - Birmingham, filed by Michael Shine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shine v. University of Alabama - Birmingham et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Alabama - Birmingham
Represented By: David R Mellon
Represented By: Spencer A Kinderman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy Litzinger
Represented By: David R Mellon
Represented By: Spencer A Kinderman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Shine
Represented By: Lee David Winston
Represented By: Roderick T Cooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?