Cunningham v. Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Lee Cunningham
Defendant: Twenty 4 Seven Recovery, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc., Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC and Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. doing business as Drivetime Car Sales Company, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv02095
Filed: December 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 TEXT ORDER finding as moot #12 Motion to Dismiss in light of Plaintiff's amended complaint, (doc. #22 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 2/12/2019. (CDG)
February 12, 2019 Filing 22 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc., Twenty 4 Seven Recovery, filed by Lee Cunningham.(AFS)
February 12, 2019 Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings and Memorandum in Support thereof filed by Lee Cunningham. (AFS)
February 5, 2019 Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Twenty 4 Seven Recovery. filed by Twenty 4 Seven Recovery (Robertson, Russell)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re #17 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. Responses are due by February 18, 2019. Replies, if any, are due by February 25, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 2/5/2019. (CDG)
February 5, 2019 Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc.. filed by Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. (Miller, Zachary)
February 4, 2019 Filing 17 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings and Memorandum in Support thereof by Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Haddad Declaration)(Miller, Zachary) Modified on 2/5/2019 (AFS, ).
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Regarding Compliance with Rule 26.(f) Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 2/1/2019. (AFS)
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than 3/18/2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after 3/18/2019. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:15 a.m. on March 4, 2019.. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-873-8017 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 4577302. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 2/1/2019. (AFS)
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Twenty 4 Seven Recovery. Plaintiff's response is due by February 14, 2019. Twenty 4 Seven Recovery's reply, if any, is due by February 21, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H. England, III on 2/1/2019. (CDG)
February 1, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Russell B Robertson on behalf of Twenty 4 Seven Recovery (Robertson, Russell)
January 31, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Twenty 4 Seven Recovery. (Robertson, Russell)
January 23, 2019 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC served on 1/22/2019, answer due 2/12/2019; Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. served on 1/22/2019, answer due 2/12/2019. (AFS)
January 15, 2019 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed Twenty 4 Seven Recovery served on 1/15/2019, answer due 2/5/2019. (AFS)
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Eletronically File Documents #7 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 1/8/2019. (AFS)
January 8, 2019 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc., Twenty 4 Seven Recovery delivered to USMS w/Form 285 for Service. (AFS)
January 4, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Filing by Lee Cunningham. (AFS)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 1/2/2019. (AFS)
January 2, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 1/2/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Lee Cunningham. (AFS)
December 21, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING Plaintiff is required to submit a statement of all assets such [person] possesses within 30 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 12/21/2018. (AFS)
December 20, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Motion is RIPE 12/20/2018. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Lee Cunningham. (JLC)
December 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc., Twenty 4 Seven Recovery, filed by Lee Cunningham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twenty 4 Seven Recovery
Represented By: Russell B Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc.
Represented By: Zachary D Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
Represented By: Zachary D Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. doing business as Drivetime Car Sales Company, LLC
Represented By: Zachary D Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?