Capstone Building Corporation et al v. Amerisure Insurance Company
Capstone Building Corporation and American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company |
Amerisure Insurance Company |
2:2018cv02130 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Karon O Bowdre |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER Governing All Further Proceedings - with appendices attached. **The report also should contain a synopsis of the case advising the court of the general claims and defenses of the parties. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 2/4/2019. (FNC) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Amerisure Insurance Company.(Turner, Kile) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company. Amerisure Insurance Company served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. (JLC) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Amerisure Insurance Company mailed certified mail (KAM) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601094370 (KAM) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company, Capstone Building Corporation. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amerisure Insurance Company, filed by Capstone Building Corporation, American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.