Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al v. Binsons Hospital Supplies Inc et al
Plaintiff: Roche Diagnostics Corporation and Roche Diabetes Care Inc
Defendant: Binsons Hospital Supplies Inc and Northwood Inc
Case Number: 2:2018mc00523
Filed: April 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2018 Filing 19 NOTICE by Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy, LLC Amended Notice of Production of Documents and Payment of Attorneys' Fees (Wilson, James)
June 29, 2018 Filing 18 NOTICE by Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy, LLC Notice of Production of Documents and Payment of Attorneys' Fees (Wilson, James)
June 25, 2018 Filing 17 CERTIFICATION of Judgment For Registration in Another District issued by clerk re order #16, amending text order #14 nunc pro tunc as of May 23, 2018 to pay pla's atty fees as stated. (Receipt #B4601090018 pd). (SWB, )
June 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER that the court's order 14 is AMENDED nun pro tunc as of May 23,2018 to specify that the Defendant is ORDERED to pay the Plaintiffs' attorney's fees of $17,901.41. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 6/21/2018. (AFS)
May 24, 2018 Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT re #11 Order on Motion for Discovery,, - Declaration of Geoffrey Potter in Support of Roche Diagnostics Corp and Roche Diabetes Care, Inc.'s Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs - Filed Under Seal by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. filed by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2 Filed Under Seal, #2 Exhibit 3, #3 Exhibit 4, #4 Exhibit 5, #5 Exhibit 6, #6 Exhibit 7, #7 Exhibit 8)(Potter, Geoffrey)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ORDER: The court's order granting the Plaintiffs' motion for contempt, doc. #11 , is hereby AMENDED to specify that the Defendant is ORDERED to pay the Plaintiffs' attorney's fees of $17,901.41. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 5/23/2018. (AFS)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal; the Plaintiff's are DIRECTED to file the Declaration of Geoffrey Potter and Exhibits 1 and 2 thereto under seal as a separate docket entry. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 5/23/2018. (AFS)
May 22, 2018 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Potter, Geoffrey)
May 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Contempt, Vincent is HELD in contempt, and is ORDERED to pay a daily fine of $1,000.00, beginning on 5/10/2018, the date of the hearing, and until it has complied with the subpoena. Vincent is also ORDERED to pay the Plaintiffs' attorney's fees and costs incurred in prosecuting the motions to compel discovery and for contempt. The Court will amend this order to add the exact amount once the Plaintiffs provide the necessary documents stating their attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 5/11/2018. (AFS)
May 4, 2018 Filing 10 RESPONSE to re #9 filed by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Potter, Geoffrey)
May 3, 2018 Filing 9 RESPONSE to re #2 ORDER, by Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy. (SAC )
May 1, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David J Canupp on behalf of Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation (Canupp, David)
April 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION for Discovery / Contempt against Non-Party Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy for failure to comply with two subpoenas : Motion Hearing set for 5/10/2018 10:00 AM at Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy LLC is ordered to appear and show cause why it should not be held in contempt. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 04/30/2018. (AFS)
April 20, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Discovery / Contempt against Non-Party Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy for failure to comply with two subpoenas by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Potter, Geoffrey)
April 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion Pro Hac VicePro Hac Vice; granting #4 Motion Pro Hac VicePro Hac Vice ; Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Joseph R. Richie and Geoffrey Potter, #3 and #4 , are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/10/2018. (KBB)
April 6, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION For Leave to Appear PHV For Joseph R. Richie by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Emmons, James)
April 6, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION For Leave to Appear PHV for Geoffrey Potter by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Emmons, James)
April 6, 2018 PHV Fee paid: $ 50, receipt number 1126-3062123 (NDAL Rec# B4601088056). (Emmons, James) Modified on 4/6/2018 (KBB).
April 6, 2018 Filing fee: $ 47.00, receipt number H4601003484 (KBB)
April 6, 2018 PHV Fee paid: $ 50, receipt number 1126-3062128 (NDAL Rec# B4601088057). (Emmons, James) Modified on 4/6/2018 (KBB).
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re #1 Motion to Compel Production Against Non-Party Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy LLC; The court has for consideration the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production Against Non-Party Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy LLC, #1 ; As stated within, for good cause shown, the motion to compel, #1 , is GRANTED, and Vincent is ORDERED to respond to the subpoena, by 4/11/2018; Failure to Comply with this order may result in sanctions, including but not limited to attorney's fees incurred by the Plaintiffs to pursue this matter. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/4/2018. (KBB)
April 3, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Production Against Non-Party Vincent Priority Care Pharmacy LLC by Roche Diabetes Care Inc, Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, #2 Exhibit 2-1, #3 Exhibit 2-2, #4 Exhibit 2-3, #5 Exhibit 2-4, #6 Exhibit 2-5, #7 Exhibit 2-6, #8 Exhibit 2-7)(KBB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al v. Binsons Hospital Supplies Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Represented By: Geoffrey Potter
Represented By: Joseph R Richie
Represented By: James Bradley Emmons
Represented By: David J Canupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roche Diabetes Care Inc
Represented By: James Bradley Emmons
Represented By: Geoffrey Potter
Represented By: Joseph R Richie
Represented By: David J Canupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Binsons Hospital Supplies Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northwood Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?