Tonya Elise Smith-Duke v. Nidek Medical Product
Tonya Elise Smith-Duke |
Nidek Medical Product |
2:2019cv00195 |
February 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John H England |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Regarding Compliance with Rule 26(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 3/11/2019. (AFS) |
Filing 9 ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than 4/22/2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after 4/22/2019. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:15 a.m. on April 8, 2019. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-873-8017 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 4577302. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 3/11/2019. (AFS) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nidek Medical Product. filed by Nidek Medical Product (Smith, Kyle) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Nidek Medical Product.(Smith, Kyle) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Nidek Medical Product served on 2/15/2019, answer due 3/8/2019. (AFS) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nidek Medical Product delivered to USM w/285 Forms for Service. (AFS) |
Filing 4 ORDER #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The application for appointment of an attorney is DENIED with leave to refile after the plaintiff has made further attempts to find an attorney through organizations established to assist litigants find attorneys, such as the Birmingham Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Program and the Alabama Bar Lawyer Referral Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 2/1/2019. (AFS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 2/1/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Tonya Elise Smith-Duke. (AFS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nidek Medical Product, filed by Tonya Elise Smith-Duke.(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tonya Elise Smith-Duke v. Nidek Medical Product | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tonya Elise Smith-Duke | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nidek Medical Product | |
Represented By: | Kyle T Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.