Tonya Elise Smith-Duke v. Nidek Medical Product
Plaintiff: Tonya Elise Smith-Duke
Defendant: Nidek Medical Product
Case Number: 2:2019cv00195
Filed: February 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Regarding Compliance with Rule 26(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 3/11/2019. (AFS)
March 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than 4/22/2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after 4/22/2019. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:15 a.m. on April 8, 2019. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-873-8017 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 4577302. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 3/11/2019. (AFS)
March 8, 2019 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nidek Medical Product. filed by Nidek Medical Product (Smith, Kyle)
March 8, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Nidek Medical Product.(Smith, Kyle)
February 21, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Nidek Medical Product served on 2/15/2019, answer due 3/8/2019. (AFS)
February 11, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nidek Medical Product delivered to USM w/285 Forms for Service. (AFS)
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The application for appointment of an attorney is DENIED with leave to refile after the plaintiff has made further attempts to find an attorney through organizations established to assist litigants find attorneys, such as the Birmingham Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Program and the Alabama Bar Lawyer Referral Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 2/1/2019. (AFS)
February 1, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS)
February 1, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 2/1/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Tonya Elise Smith-Duke. (AFS)
February 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nidek Medical Product, filed by Tonya Elise Smith-Duke.(AFS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tonya Elise Smith-Duke v. Nidek Medical Product
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tonya Elise Smith-Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nidek Medical Product
Represented By: Kyle T Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?