Wilson v. Deshazo Cranes LLC
| Corey Lynn Wilson |
| Deshazo Cranes LLC |
| 2:2019cv00300 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| T Michael Putnam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER- The court has entered an order setting deadlines for the briefing of the motion to dismiss (Doc #11 ); The motion to dismiss, however, seeks alternative relief in the form of summary judgment; The court hereby informs the pltf of the rules governing summary disposition, and provides additional time for responding to the motion; The deadlines set in the courts order entered April 10, 2019, are hereby EXTENDED as follows: the pltf may file any responsive brief and evidence in opposition to the motion no later than May 6, 2019; the deft may file any reply no later than May 13, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 4/15/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than May 22, 2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after May 22, 2019. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:00 am on May 6, 2019, in chambers. The conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 4/10/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER re #11 MOTION to Dismiss or, In The Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Deshazo Cranes LLC. Any opposition to the motion shall be filed within 14 days. Any reply may be filed within seven days after any opposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 4/10/2019. (PMA)
|
| Filing 13 ***Document Sealed pursuant to Order Doc 10- Exhibit B of Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc #11 )-filed by DeShazo LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B) (MRR, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Deshazo Cranes LLC (Holmes, John) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss or, In The Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment by Deshazo Cranes LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Holmes, John) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File under seal. The defendant is given leave to file Exhibit B to its motion to dismiss or for summary judgment under seal. The settlement agreement described as Exhibit B shall be filed contemporaneous with, but as a separate document from, the motion, brief and any other exhibits. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 4/9/2019. (PMA)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Exhibit Under Seal by Deshazo Cranes LLC. (Holmes, John) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Deshazo Cranes LLC served on 3/20/2019, answer due 4/10/2019. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Deshazo Cranes LLC., sent to US Marshals for service (MRR, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER- Pltf filed a second affidavit in support of his motion for in forma pauperis status, again seeking appointment of an attorney (Doc. #5 ); The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 3/6/19. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 5 Amended MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 3/5/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Corey Lynn Wilson. (MRR, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER- Pltf's motion to proceed without payment of the filing fee is DENIED; The motion for appointment of counsel also is DENIED for the reasons stated within; The pltf is DIRECTED to pay the filing fee within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 2/20/19. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 2/19/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed, by Corey Lynn Wilson. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Deshazo Cranes LLC, filed by Corey Lynn Wilson.(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Deshazo Cranes LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Corey Lynn Wilson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Deshazo Cranes LLC | |
| Represented By: | John B Holmes, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
