Dunning et al v. GHS Interactive Security, LLC et al
| Freddie Dunning, Jr. and Paulethea Dunning |
| Preston Burnett and GHS Interactive Security, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00376 |
| March 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Karon O Bowdre |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
TEXT ORDER: The Court GRANTS #26 Plaintiffs' counsel's "Motion for Extension of Time to File Accounting of Costs and Fees Pursuant to Court Order (Doc. 25)." The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs' counsel to file an accounting of costs and fees recoverable by August 2, 2019. Defendant GHS Interactive LLC shall file its response, if any, by August 9, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 7/24/2019. (JLC)
|
| Filing 26 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Accounting of Costs and Fees Pursuant to Court Order (Doc 25) by Freddie Dunning, Jr, Paulethea Dunning. (Bahakel, A) |
|
Filing 25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs' Request for attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 1447(c)as to Defendant GHS Interactive Security, LLC but DENIES Plaintiffs request as to Mr. Defendant Preston Burnett. The Court DIRECTS Plaintiffs to file with the Court an accounting of the costs and fees that are recoverable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) on or before July 26, 2019. Defendant GHS shall file its response as to the reasonableness of those fees, if necessary, on or before August 2, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 7/17/2019. (JLC)
|
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to re #21 Defendant GHS Interactive Security, LLC's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause filed by GHS Interactive Security, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Affidavit of L. Jackson Young, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Chart)(Young, L) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE to re #21 Defendant Preston Burnett's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause Regarding Plaintiffs' Request for Costs and Attorneys' Fees under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) filed by Preston Burnett. (Espy, Chase) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Remand re #21 Order Remanding Case. (JLC) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING #8 MOTION to Remand and the Court hereby REMANDS this case to the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama as set out herein. The Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before May 31, 2019, why the Court should not grant Plaintiffs' request for costs and expenses. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 5/17/2019. (JLC)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY to re #19 Joint Response to Motion to Remand filed by Freddie Dunning, Jr, Paulethea Dunning. (Bahakel, A) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by GHS Interactive Security, LLC. (Lam, Tina) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER: The court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART #15 Defendant Preston Burnett's "Consolidated Motion to Withdraw and Motion for Extension of Time." The court DENIES Mr. Burnett's attorneys' motion to withdraw but GRANTS Mr. Burnett's motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' motion to remand. The court GRANTS #17 "Defendant GHS Interactive Security, LLC's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time." Both Defendants' responses to #8 Plaintiffs' "Motion to Remand" shall be filed on or before May 3, 2019, and Plaintiffs' reply brief, if necessary, will be due on or before May 10, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 4/25/19. (CAK2)
|
| Filing 17 Second MOTION for Extension of Time (unopposed) by GHS Interactive Security, LLC. (Young, L) |
| Filing 16 Opposition to re #15 to Preston Burnett's Motion for Extension of Time filed by Freddie Dunning, Jr, Paulethea Dunning. (Bahakel, A) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney , MOTION for Extension of Time by Preston Burnett. (Leavens, Joseph) |
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) and for the reasons discussed during the telephone status conference held on April 15, 2019, the court DENIES #10 "Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint." Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 4/16/19. (CAK2)
|
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER: As discussed at the telephone status conference held on April 15, 2019, the court GRANTS #11 "Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand." Defendants' response is now due on or before April 26, 2019, and any reply, if necessary, will be due on or before May 3, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 4/15/19. (CAK2)
|
| Reset Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Remand. Responses due on or before April 26, 2019. Replies due on or before May 3, 2019. (JLC) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre: Telephone Conference held on 4/15/2019. (FNC) |
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER: Telephone Status Conference set for Monday, April 15, 2019 at 01:30 PM. Counsel will receive the conference call information by e-mail. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 4/11/19. (CAK2)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Remand by Preston Burnett, GHS Interactive Security, LLC. (Espy, Chase) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Freddie Dunning, Jr, Paulethea Dunning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A)(Bahakel, A) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: This matter comes before the court on #8 Plaintiffs' "Motion to Remand." Defendants' response will be due on or before April 15, 2019. Any reply brief, if necessary, will be due on or before April 22, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 4/1/19. (CAK2)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Freddie Dunning, Jr, Paulethea Dunning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit)(Bahakel, A) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Freddie Dunning, Jr, Paulethea Dunning. (Bahakel, A) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER Governing All Further Proceedings - with appendices attached. The report also should contain a synopsis of the case advising the court of the general claims and defenses of the parties. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/13/2019. (FNC)
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: This matter comes before the court on #3 "Defendant GHS Interactive Security, LLC's Motion for More Definite Statement." Any response shall be due on or before March 25, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/11/19. (CAK2)
|
| Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for More Definite Statement. Responses due on or before March 25, 2019. (JLC) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Preston Burnett.(Leavens, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for More Definite Statement by GHS Interactive Security, LLC. (Young, L) |
| Filing 2 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by GHS Interactive Security, LLC.(Young, L) |
| Filing Fee received in the amount of $400.00, receipt number B4601095839. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Preston Burnett from Jefferson County Circuit Court, case number 01-CV-2018-902491.00., filed by Preston Burnett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC) |
| COMPLAINT against Preston Burnett, GHS Interactive Security, LLC, filed by Paulethea Dunning, Freddie Dunning, Jr. (Deemed filed 6/20/2018 in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, attached to the Notice of Removal as Exhibit A).(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
