Stoney v. Stoney et al
| Mark Andrew Stoney |
| Unincorporated Organization of Lori Stoney, Andrew Stoney, Lori A Stoney and Andrew Stoney |
| 2:2019cv00573 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, therefore this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/29/2019. (AFS)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Abdul K Kallon for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge John H England, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 4/25/2019. (AFS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 4/15/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Mark Andrew Stoney. (AFS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Stoney, Lori A Stoney, Unincorporated Organization of Lori Stoney, Andrew Stoney, filed by Mark Andrew Stoney.(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
