Parker v. Petrovics et al
| A Johnson Parker |
| Andrew Petrovics, Pointz Inc, Innovation Depot Inc and Kathleen Hamrick |
| 2:2019cv00699 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Trademark |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Innovation Depot Inc. (AFS) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Kathleen Hamrick served on 6/17/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (AFS) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Pointz Inc served on 6/20/2019, answer due 7/11/2019. (AFS) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by A Johnson Parker. Andrew Petrovics served on 6/20/2019, answer due 7/11/2019. (KEK) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kathleen Hamrick, Innovation Depot Inc, Andrew Petrovics, Pointz Inc. mailed certified mail. (AFS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AFS) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3341754. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Kathleen Hamrick, Innovation Depot Inc, Andrew Petrovics, Pointz Inc, filed by A Johnson Parker.(AFS). (Pantazis, Evan) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by A Johnson Parker. (AFS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathleen Hamrick, Innovation Depot Inc, Andrew Petrovics, Pointz Inc, filed by A Johnson Parker.(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
